Factors Associated With Long Survival in Patients With Cancer Admitted to Palliative Care: An Exploratory Study.

Objective: Some patients with cancer admitted to palliative care have relatively long survivals of 1 year or more. The objective of this study was to find out factors associated with prolonged survival. Methods: Retrospective case-control study comparing the available data of patients with cancer who survived more than 1 year after admission in a palliative care service with patients with cancer who survived 6 months or less. The intended proportion was 4 controls for each case. Patients were identified through electronic records from 2012 until 2018. Results: And 1721 patients were identified. Of those patients, 111 (6.4%) survived for at least 1 year, and 363 (21.1%) were included as controls according to the established criteria. The intended proportion could not be reached; the proportion was only 3.3:1. The median survival of cases was 581 days (range: 371-2763), and the median survival of controls was 57 days (range: 1-182). In the multivariable analysis, patients with a hemoglobin ≥ 10.6 g/dL and a creatinine level >95 µmol/L had a higher probability of living more than 1 year. In contrast, patients with abnormal cognition, pain, anorexia, liver metastases, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status >1, and a neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio ≥ 3.43 had a low probability of living more than 1 year. Conclusion: Several factors were statistically associated positively or negatively with prolonged survival. However, the data of this study should be confirmed in other studies.

Second primary cancers among females with a first primary breast cancer: a population-based study in Northern Portugal.

PURPOSE: To estimate the incidence rate of second primary cancers (SPCs) and the cumulative incidence of metachronous [diagnosed > 2 months after a first primary cancer (FPC)] SPCs in patients with a breast FPC, and to compare the incidence of SPC [overall, synchronous (≤ 2 months of the FPC) and metachronous] with that expected in the general female population. METHODS: A cohort of patients with a breast FPC from the North Region Cancer Registry of Portugal, diagnosed in 2000-2010 (n = 15,981), was followed to 31 December 2015 for synchronous and metachronous SPCs. Cumulative incidence of metachronous SPCs considering death as a competing event, and incidence rates and standardized incidence ratios of SPCs were estimated. RESULTS: The diagnosis of an SPC occurred in 1229 (7.7%) of patients with a breast FPC. SPCs occurred mainly in the breast, followed by digestive organs, lung, thyroid, and female genital organs. Globally, patients with a breast FPC had a higher incidence for all types of cancer compared to the general female population, and in particular for cancers of the breast, stomach, colon, lung, lymphoma, uterus, and ovary. The 10-year cumulative incidence of metachronous SPCs following a breast FPC was 6.6% and the corresponding 10-year cumulative mortality was 26.2%. CONCLUSION: In Portugal, patients with a breast FPC have a higher incidence of cancer compared to the general female population, highlighting important aspects of care, surveillance, and counselling among this growing number of patients.

The crosstalk between Stroke and Cancer: Incidence of cancer after a first-ever cerebrovascular event in a population-based study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the cancer incidence after the first-ever cerebrovascular event (CVE) and compare it to the cancer incidence in the population from the same region. METHODS: We evaluated 1069 patients with a first-ever CVE (Ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke and Transient Ischaemic Attack) from a prospective population registry of stroke and transient focal neurological attacks, diagnosed between 2009 and 2011. We conducted a structured search to identify cancer-related variables and case-fatality for a period of 8 years following CVE. Cancer incidence in CVE patients was compared to the North Region Cancer Registry (RORENO). RESULTS: We found that 90/1069 (8.4%) CVE patients developed cancer after a first-ever CVE. Overall cancer annual incidence rate was higher after a CVE (820/100,000, 95%CI: 619-1020) than in general population (513/100,000, 95%CI: 508-518). In the 45-54 age group cancer incidence post-CVE was 3.2-fold (RR, 95%CI: 1.6-6.4) higher compared to the general population, decreasing gradually in older age-groups. Median time between CVE and cancer was 3.2 years (IQR = 1.4-5.2). Lower respiratory tract and colorectal were the most frequent cancer types. In univariable models, male sex (sHR = 1.78, 95%CI: 1.17-2.72, p = 0.007), tobacco use (sHR = 2.04, 95%CI: 1.31-3.18, p = 0.002) and peripheral artery disease (sHR = 2.37, 95%CI: 1.10-5.13, p = 0.028) were associated to higher cancer risk after CVE. After adjustment, tobacco use (sHR = 1.84, 95%CI: 1.08-3.14, p = 0.026) remained associated to a higher risk of cancer. CONCLUSIONS: At the population level, patients presenting a first-ever CVE have higher cancer incidence, that is particularly prominent in younger age-groups. Higher cancer incidence, delayed cancer diagnosis and increased mortality post-CVE warrants further research on long-term cancer surveillance in first-ever CVE survivors.

Costs, effectiveness, and safety associated with Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy: Results from a comprehensive cancer center.

Real world effectiveness, toxicity and costs analyses from chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy are of utmost relevance to determine whether and how to offer patients highly personalized immunotherapy. In this study, we aimed at describing CAR T-cells effectiveness, safety and costs in a Portuguese Comprehensive Cancer Center. We performed a retrospective descriptive study of adult patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma and transformed follicular lymphoma referred to CAR T-cell therapy, between May 2019 and February 2021. Rates of treatment response, toxicity and survival (Kaplan-Meier method) were analyzed by intention-to-treat. Direct medical costs stratified by inpatient-care, outpatient-care, and diagnostic-therapeutic procedures (DTP) were derived based on resources used and their respective unit costs. In twenty patients (median age 49.5y; 55%male; 70%DLBCL; 50% with primary refractory disease), best overall and complete response rates were 65.0% and 45.0%, respectively. Median overall (OS) and progression-free survivals were 9.2 and 7.3 months; 12-month OS rate was 42.6% (95%CI:23.2-78.3). Grade≥3 cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity occurred in 5.6% and 11.1% of patients, respectively. CAR T-cell therapy expenditure, including adverse events costs, was 7 176 196€, or 286 238€ when excluding drug cost. Median cost for treated patient was 355 165€ with CAR T-cell drug cost accounting for 97.0% of the overall expense. Excluding CAR T-cell acquisition cost, inpatient-care and DTP accounted for 57% and 38% of total cost/patient, respectively. Our findings highlight the heavy economic burden of CAR T-cell therapy driven by drug acquisition costs.

Association of Sentinel Node Biopsy and Pathological Report Completeness with Survival Benefit for Cutaneous Melanoma and Factors Influencing Their Different Uses in European Populations.

Objectives: Standard care for cutaneous melanoma includes an accurate pathology report (PR) and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for staging clinically node-negative >1 mm melanomas. We aimed to investigate the frequency of these indicators across European countries, also assessing consequences for survival. Methods: We analyzed 4245 melanoma cases diagnosed in six European countries in 2009−2013. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the Odds Ratio (OR) of receiving complete PR with eight items or SLNB and model-based survival to estimate the five-year relative excess risks of death (RER). Results: Overall, 12% patients received a complete PR (range 2.3%, Estonia­20.1%, Italy); SLNB was performed for 68.8% of those with cN0cM0 stage (range 54.4%, Spain­81.7%, Portugal). The adjusted OR of receiving a complete PR was lower than the mean in Estonia (OR 0.11 (0.06−0.18)) and higher in Italy (OR 6.39 (4.90−8.34)) and Portugal (OR 1.39 (1.02−1.89)); it was higher for patients operated on in specialized than general hospitals (OR 1.42 (1.08−1.42)). In the multivariate models adjusted for age, sex, country and clinical-pathological characteristics, the RER resulted in being higher than the reference for patients not receiving a complete PR with eight items (RER 1.72 (1.08−2.72)), or for those not undergoing SLNB (RER 1.76 (1.26−2.47)) Patients with non-metastatic node-negative thickness >1 mm melanoma who did not undergo SLNB had a higher risk of death (RER (RER 1.69 (1.02−2.80)) than those who did. Conclusions: Accurate pathology profiling and SLNB carried survival benefit. Narrowing down between-countries differences in adhesion to guidelines might achieve better outcomes.

Risk and Survival of Third Primary Cancers in a Population-Based Cohort of Breast Cancer Patients.

Introduction: The growing number of women diagnosed with breast cancer (BCa) together with high survival has resulted in an increasing population of survivors at risk of subsequent primary cancers. This study aimed to estimate the long-term risk and survival of third primary cancers (TPCs) among females with a first primary BCa. Methods: Breast first primary cancers (FPCs) from the Portuguese North Region Cancer Registry, diagnosed between 2000 and 2010 (n = 15,981), were followed for a TPC (December 31, 2015) and death from any cause (June 30, 2021). The cumulative incidence of and mortality among TPCs were estimated. To compare survival, female patients with a TPC were matched (1:1, by age group, years between FPC and second primary cancer [SPC] diagnosis, and SPC location) to FPC + SPC patients without a TPC. Results: Overall, 67 (0.4% of FPCs and 5.4% of SPCs) TPCs were diagnosed. The most common TPC sites were digestive, breast, and female genital organs. Among all FPCs, the 15-year cumulative incidence (95% confidence interval [CI]) of a TPC was 0.69% (0.47-0.90%) and among SPCs, 7.21% (4.99-9.43%). The 15-year cumulative mortality of TPCs and matched patients was 70.0% and 51.5%, respectively. For TPCs, compared to matched SPC only patients, the age-adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) for death was 2.86 (1.61-5.07). Discussion/Conclusion: The most common TPC sites were digestive, breast, and female genital organs, with a 15-year cumulative incidence of 0.69% among FPCs. TPCs had a worse long-term survival compared to patients with an SPC only.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: survival trend analysis of a comprehensive center.

Objectives: Therapeutic options for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasia (Pan-NEN) have increased over the last decade. We aim to understand the evolution of the prognosis of patients with diagnosis of Pan-NEN within a 12-year period, considering the implementation of new treatments. Methods: This study is a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with Pan-NENs between 2006 and 2017. Survival outcome estimates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. The impact of baseline clinicopathological characteristics on survival was explored with the use of Cox proportional hazard model. Results: Of the 97 patients, 77 (79.9%) had well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (NET) according to WHO 2010 classification, and 52 (53.6%) had localized or locoregional disease. There were no differences between clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes when comparing patients diagnosed between 2006-2011 and 2012-2017. Neuroendocrine carcinoma - HR 2.76, 95% CI 1.17-6.55 - and stages III and IV at diagnosis were independent poor prognostic factors - HR 6.02, 95% CI 2.22-16.33 and HR 6.93, 95% CI 2.94-16.32, respectively. Conclusions: The new therapeutic approaches did not induce better survival outcomes on Pan-NEN in recent years. This is possibly due to the indolent nature of NET grades 1 and 2, even metastatic, allowing patients to be submitted to new target therapies along their disease course.

The impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on the diagnosis and treatment of cancer in Northern Portugal.

OBJECTIVES: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected the availability of healthcare resources, and adjustments to cancer care have been necessary considering the risk of morbidity by COVID-19 and of cancer progression. This study aims to quantify the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the care of patients with cancer by comparing a period of 4 months after the outbreak began (2 March 2020) with an equal period from 2019. METHODS: Cancer cases of the esophagus, stomach, colon and rectum, pancreas, lung, skin-melanoma, breast, cervix, prostate, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and leukemia from the Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, and diagnosed between 2 March and 1 July 2019 (before COVID-19) and 2020 (after COVID-19) were identified. Those with the first treatment outside the Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto were excluded. Sociodemographic, clinical and treatment characteristics were obtained from the cancer registry database and clinical files. RESULTS: The absolute number of new cancer cases decreased nearly 40% after the COVID-19 pandemic (from 1430 to 866). The largest decreases were observed for cervical (-74.3%) and prostate (-71.7%) cancers. Cases were more often diagnosed at more advanced stages in 2020 (P = 0.001), and the proportion of patients not starting any treatment until 1 July was just under 20% in 2019 and nearly 40% in 2020. The median times from symptoms onset, first medical exam and first appointment to diagnosis, and from diagnosis to first appointment, multidisciplinary tumor board meeting and first treatment were shorter after COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: There was a notable overall decrease in cancer diagnoses after COVID-19, with changes in the characteristics of incident cases.

Colorectal Screening Program in Northern Portugal: First Findings.

INTRODUCTION: In Portugal, a colorectal cancer screening program based on faecal immunochemical test followed by colonoscopy was shown to be cost-effective for individuals between 50 and 74 years old. We report the first findings of the implementation of a population-based program In Northern Portugal. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the pilot phase, eligible subjects were allocated either to a direct mailing invitation or to primary care centers. In the first year of program implementation, we assessed the uptake rate, the faecal immunochemical test -positivity rate, the diagnostic yield of advanced neoplasia, and the quality parameters for post-faecal immunochemical test + colonoscopy. RESULTS: We invited 100 501 eligible subjects (49% male with a median age of 55 years). Of these, 5228 participated in the pilot phase and 95 273 participated in the first year of the program. In the first year of the program, the adherence was 29%, with a positivity rate of 5% and a 60% compliance to colonoscopy. The faecal immunochemical test-detection rate of advanced neoplasia was 0.35/1000 subjects, and the positive predictive value at post- faecal immunochemical test + colonoscopy was 44% and 2% for advanced adenoma and invasive cancer, respectively. No major adverse events were reported after colonoscopy. DISCUSSION: The suboptimal adherence to faecal immunochemical test and post-faecal immunochemical test + colonoscopy remains the most urgent step to be addressed. CONCLUSION: A centralized invitation system based on direct mailing was feasible and both colonoscopy quality and diagnostic yield were adequate antecipating the success of the programme.

Introdução: Em Portugal, foi demonstrado que o rastreio do cancro colo-rectal, baseado no teste imunoquímico fecal seguido de colonoscopia, seria custo-efetivo para indivíduos entre os 50 e 74 anos. Neste artigo reportamos os primeiros resultados da implementação do programa de base populacional na região Norte de Portugal. Material e Métodos: Na fase piloto, os sujeitos elegíveis foram alocados a dois métodos, por convite através do correio ou por meio de entrega direta nos centros de saúde. No primeiro ano de implementação do programa avaliámos a taxa de adesão, a taxa de positividade de teste imunoquímico fecal, o rendimento diagnóstico de neoplasia avançada e os parâmetros de qualidade da colonoscopia pós- teste imunoquímico fecal positivo. Resultados: Foram convidados 100 501 indivíduos elegíveis (49% do sexo masculino com idade mediana de 55 anos). Destes, 5228 participaram na fase piloto e 95 273 participaram no primeiro ano do programa. No primeiro ano do programa, a adesão foi de 29%, com taxa de positividade de 5% e adesão de 60% às colonoscopias. A taxa de deteção de teste imunoquímico fecal de neoplasia avançada foi de 0,35/1000 indivíduos, e o valor preditivo positivo na colonoscopia pós-teste imunoquímico fecal positivo foi de 44% e 2% para adenoma avançado e cancro invasivo, respetivamente. Não foi relatado nenhum evento adverso após colonoscopia. Discussão: A adesão subótima a teste imunoquímico fecal e colonoscopia pós-teste imunoquímico fecal continua a ser a etapa mais problemática. Conclusão: Um sistema de convite centralizado foi viável, a qualidade das colonoscopias realizadas e o rendimento diagnóstico adequados antecipando o sucesso do programa.

Dealing with missing information on covariates for excess mortality hazard regression models - Making the imputation model compatible with the substantive model.

Missing data is a common issue in epidemiological databases. Among the different ways of dealing with missing data, multiple imputation has become more available in common statistical software packages. However, the incompatibility between the imputation and substantive model, which can arise when the associations between variables in the substantive model are not taken into account in the imputation models or when the substantive model is itself nonlinear, can lead to invalid inference. Aiming at analysing population-based cancer survival data, we extended the multiple imputation substantive model compatible-fully conditional specification (SMC-FCS) approach, proposed by Bartlett et al. in 2015 to accommodate excess hazard regression models. The proposed approach was compared with the standard fully conditional specification multiple imputation procedure and with the complete-case analysis using a simulation study. The SMC-FCS approach produced unbiased estimates in both scenarios tested, while the fully conditional specification produced biased estimates and poor empirical coverages probabilities. The SMC-FCS algorithm was then used for handling missing data in the evaluation of socioeconomic inequalities in survival from colorectal cancer patients diagnosed in the North Region of Portugal. The analysis using SMC-FCS showed a clearer trend in higher excess hazards for patients coming from more deprived areas. The proposed algorithm was implemented in R software and is presented as Supplementary Material.

The addition of neoadjuvant pertuzumab for the treatment of HER2+ breast cancer: a cost estimate with real-world data.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) is largely prevalent worldwide. HER2-positive BC account for roughly 20-25% of all BC cases and has an overall survival lower than other BC. Innovation on BC therapeutics is a constant, but novel therapies have higher costs. Therefore, cost-effectiveness research is essential to provide healthcare decision-makers with solid foundations for a resource allocation. This study aims to estimate the average direct medical costs/patient and cost-effectiveness of adding pertuzumab in neoadjuvant treatment (NeoT) for HER2-positive breast cancer (BC). METHODS: Two retrospective real-world consecutive cohorts of ≥18yo female patients diagnosed with HER2-positive BC treated with NeoT at the Breast Clinic of IPO-Porto were studied. The AC-DH regimen (2012-2015) comprised 8 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy (4 cycles of doxorubicin + cyclosphosphamide followed by 4 cycles ofdocetaxel + trastuzumab), while the AC-DHP regimen (2015-2017) included also pertuzumab as NeoT. NeoT was followed by surgery and adjuvant trastuzumab. Micro-costing technique and a bottom-up approach was used comprising all medical direct costs from the hospital perspective. Unit costs were obtained from government official prices or from IPO-Porto costing system. Costs were adjusted to 2017 and are expressed in euros. Multivariable logistic regression models were used for effectiveness assessment, while generalized linear models with gamma distribution were used for costs. ICER was calculated using the pathological complete response (pCR) as the preferential measure of effectiveness. Sensitivity analysis was also performed. RESULTS: AC-DHP (n = 40) and AC-DH (n = 54) cohorts had heterogenous patient profiles (median age 43y/53y; 67.5%/59.3% positive HR; 60.0%/27.8% operable; 25.0%/24.1% inflammatory, respectively). The AC-DHP average total cost/patient was 56,375€, with pertuzumab accounting for 13,978€ (24.79%) and increasing in 15,982€ the average cost/patient (p < 0.001). Clinical staging and hormone receptors (HR) were significantly associated with pCR. ICER was 1.370€ per percentage point of pCR. CONCLUSIONS: ICER was more favourable in stage III HR negative BC patients compared to other patient profiles. Innovative treatments access is critical to deliver high-quality healthcare, but sustainability must be considered. These results suggest the importance of establishing a cost-effectiveness profile of Pertuzumab in NeoT for HER2-positive BC.

Small cell lung cancer treatment and survival in Portugal: A retrospective analysis from the I-O Optimise initiative.

OBJECTIVE: We aim to describe treatment patterns and overall survival (OS) among a Portuguese cohort of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). METHODS: This study utilised a database held by IPO-Porto, Portugal's largest oncology hospital. Adult patients diagnosed with SCLC at IPO-Porto between January 2012 and June 2017, with follow-up to December 2017, were included. Patients were stratified into subgroups with limited disease (LD) or extensive disease (ED). Treatment analyses were performed from 2015 onwards. RESULTS: Overall, 227 patients diagnosed with SCLC (37 LD; 190 ED) were analysed. Median OS (interquartile range [IQR]) was 15.0 months (3.8-39.3) for LD-SCLC and 5.0 months (1.7-10.3) for ED-SCLC. Among 19 patients diagnosed with LD-SCLC from 2015 onwards, 12 (63.2%) received initial treatment with systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) ± radiotherapy; 6 (31.6%) received best supportive care (BSC). Among 89 patients with ED-SCLC, 57 (68.5%) received SACT ± palliative radiotherapy; 28 (31.5%) received BSC. For patients receiving platinum doublet chemotherapy (±radiotherapy), median OS (IQR) was not reached for LD-SCLC and 5.4 months (2.3-10.9) for ED-SCLC. CONCLUSION: This real-world data analysis from a large Portuguese oncology hospital demonstrates a high disease burden for patients diagnosed with SCLC, particularly those with ED, and highlights a need for more effective therapies.

Treatment and outcomes for early non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective analysis of a Portuguese hospital database.

AIM: This observational study evaluated treatment patterns and survival for patients with stage I-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS & METHODS: Adults newly diagnosed with NSCLC in 2012-2016 at IPO-Porto hospital were included. Treatment data were available for patients diagnosed in 2015-2016. RESULTS: 495 patients were included (median age: 67 years). The most common treatments were surgery alone or with another therapy (stage I: 66%) and systemic anticancer therapy plus radiotherapy (stage II: 54%; stage IIIA: 59%). One-year OS (95% CI) for patients with stage I, II and IIIA NSCLC (diagnosed 2012-2016) were 92% (88-96), 71% (62-82) and 69% (63-75), respectively; one-year OS (95% CI) for treated patients with stage I-II or stage IIIA NSCLC (diagnosed 2015-2016) were 89% (81-97) and 86% (75-98) for non-squamous cell and 76% (60-95) and 49% (34-70) for squamous cell NSCLC. CONCLUSION: Treatment advances are strongly needed for stage I-IIIA NSCLC, especially for patients with squamous cell histology.

Colorectal cancer incidence, mortality, and stage distribution in European countries in the colorectal cancer screening era: an international population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer screening programmes and uptake vary substantially across Europe. We aimed to compare changes over time in colorectal cancer incidence, mortality, and stage distribution in relation to colorectal cancer screening implementation in European countries. METHODS: Data from nearly 3·1 million patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed from 2000 onwards (up to 2016 for most countries) were obtained from 21 European countries, and were used to analyse changes over time in age-standardised colorectal cancer incidence and stage distribution. The WHO mortality database was used to analyse changes over time in age-standardised colorectal cancer mortality over the same period for the 16 countries with nationwide data. Incidence rates were calculated for all sites of the colon and rectum combined, as well as the subsites proximal colon, distal colon, and rectum. Average annual percentage changes (AAPCs) in incidence and mortality were estimated and relevant patterns were descriptively analysed. FINDINGS: In countries with long-standing programmes of screening colonoscopy and faecal tests (ie, Austria, the Czech Republic, and Germany), colorectal cancer incidence decreased substantially over time, with AAPCs ranging from -2·5% (95% CI -2·8 to -2·2) to -1·6% (-2·0 to -1·2) in men and from -2·4% (-2·7 to -2·1) to -1·3% (-1·7 to -0·9) in women. In countries where screening programmes were implemented during the study period, age-standardised colorectal cancer incidence either remained stable or increased up to the year screening was implemented. AAPCs for these countries ranged from -0·2% (95% CI -1·4 to 1·0) to 1·5% (1·1 to 1·8) in men and from -0·5% (-1·7 to 0·6) to 1·2% (0·8 to 1·5) in women. Where high screening coverage and uptake were rapidly achieved (ie, Denmark, the Netherlands, and Slovenia), age-standardised incidence rates initially increased but then subsequently decreased. Conversely, colorectal cancer incidence increased in most countries where no large-scale screening programmes were available (eg, Bulgaria, Estonia, Norway, and Ukraine), with AAPCs ranging from 0·3% (95% CI 0·1 to 0·5) to 1·9% (1·2 to 2·6) in men and from 0·6% (0·4 to 0·8) to 1·1% (0·8 to 1·4) in women. The largest decreases in colorectal cancer mortality were seen in countries with long-standing screening programmes. INTERPRETATION: We observed divergent trends in colorectal cancer incidence, mortality, and stage distribution across European countries, which appear to be largely explained by different levels of colorectal cancer screening implementation. FUNDING: German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe) and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the short-term survival of patients with cancer in Northern Portugal.

The COVID-19 pandemic led to potential delays in diagnosis and treatment of cancer patients, which may negatively affect the prognosis of these patients. Our study aimed to quantify the impact of COVID-19 on the short-term survival of cancer patients by comparing a period of 4 months after the outbreak began (2 March 2020) with an equal period from 2019. All cancer cases of the esophagus, stomach, colon and rectum, pancreas, lung, skin-melanoma, breast, cervix, and prostate, from the Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO-Porto) and diagnosed between 2 March and 1 July of 2019 (before COVID-19) and 2020 (after COVID-19) were identified. Information regarding sociodemographic, clinical and treatment characteristics were collected from the cancer registry database and clinical files. Vital status was assessed to 31 October of the respective years. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate crude and propensity score-adjusted hazards ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) of death. During follow-up to 31 October, there were 154 (11.8%) deaths observed before COVID-19 and 131 (17.2%) after COVID-19, corresponding to crude and adjusted HRs (95% CI) of 1.51 (1.20-1.91) and 1.10 (0.86-1.40), respectively. Significantly higher adjusted hazards of death were observed for patients with Stage III cancer (HR = 2.37; 95% CI: 1.14-4.94) and those undergoing surgical treatment (HR = 3.97; 95% CI: 1.14-13.77) or receiving radiotherapy (HR = 1.96; 95% CI: 1.96-3.74), while patients who did not receive any treatment had a lower mortality hazards (HR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.46-0.83). The higher overall short-term mortality observed during the COVID-19 pandemic largely reflects the effects of the epidemic on the case-mix of patients being diagnosed with cancer.

Differences in the management and survival of metastatic colorectal cancer in Europe. A population-based study.

BACKGROUND: The management regarding metastatic colorectal cancer throughout Europe is not well known. AIMS: To draw a European comparison of the management and prognosis of metastatic colorectal cancers. METHODS: Factors associated with chemotherapy administration were identified through logistic regressions. Net survival was estimated and crude probabilities of death related to cancer and other causes using a flexible cumulative hazard model. RESULTS: Among the 13 227 patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed between 2010 and 2013 in cancer registries from 10 European countries, 3140 were metastatic. 62% of metastatic patients received chemotherapy. Compared to Spain, the related adjusted odds ratios ranged from 0.7 to 4.0 (P<0.001) according to country. The 3-year net survival by country ranged between 16% and 37%. The survival gap between countries diminished from 21% to 10% when adjusting for chemotherapy, age and sex. Geographical differences in the crude probability of death related to cancer were large for patients <70 or ≥80 years at diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Heterogeneity in the application of European guidelines partly explain these differences. General health between populations, accessibility to a reference centre, or provision of health care could also be involved. Further population-based studies are warranted to disentangle between these possible explanations.

Real-world treatment patterns and survival outcomes for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the pre-immunotherapy era in Portugal: a retrospective analysis from the I-O Optimise initiative.

BACKGROUND: As part of the multinational I-O Optimise research initiative, this retrospective cohort study of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) evaluated real-world treatment patterns and survival prior to immunotherapy reimbursement in Portugal. METHODS: This study utilized a database held by IPO-Porto, Portugal's largest oncology hospital. Adult patients diagnosed with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC from January 2012 to December 2016 at IPO-Porto, with follow-up to June 2017, were included. Treatment analyses were performed from 2015 onwards. Kaplan-Meier methods were used for overall survival (OS). Factors associated with OS and systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) treatment were assessed using multivariate statistical models. RESULTS: Of 1524 patients diagnosed with NSCLC at IPO-Porto, 1008 patients had advanced disease (stage IIIB: 10.1%, 154/1524, stage IV: 56.0%, 854/1524). For those with advanced disease, median age was 65 years (range: 21-92) and 75.6% (762/1008) were male. Median OS (interquartile range [IQR]) was 11.4 (5.2-26.9) months for stage IIIB and 6.3 (2.4-15.0) months for stage IV. Factors associated with decreased risk of death included female sex and epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR)/anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene (ALK) mutations/rearrangements; factors associated with increased risk of death included older age and stage IV disease. Among patients diagnosed in 2015 or 2016, 75.8% (297/392) received ≥1 line of SACT. Platinum-based chemotherapy was the most common first-line therapy (non-squamous cell carcinoma [NSQ]: 72.9%; squamous cell carcinoma [SQ] 87.3%, 55/63; patients with EGFR/ALK mutations/rearrangements primarily received tyrosine kinase inhibitors). The likelihood of receiving SACT was lower in older patients and those diagnosed with stage IV disease. Patients not receiving SACT had poor survival outcomes (median OS [IQR]: NSQ, 1.8 [1.1-3.1] months; SQ, 2.3 (1.3-3.4) months), while median OS (IQR) in SACT-treated patients was 12.6 (6.1-24.5) months for NSQ and 10.3 (5.7-15.9) months for SQ. CONCLUSIONS: This real-world data analysis from a large Portuguese oncology hospital demonstrates a high disease burden for advanced NSCLC in the pre-immunotherapy era, with nearly one-quarter of patients not receiving SACT. Even in patients receiving SACT, median survival was only about 1 year.

Second primary gastric cancers in a region with an overall high risk of gastric cancer / Segundos cánceres primarios gástricos en una región con un alto riesgo global de cáncer gástrico

OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence rates of gastric cancer among cancer survivors with those in the general population, and estimate the probability of a gastric second primary cancer being diagnosed 10 years after any other first primary cancer. METHOD: A cohort of first primary cancers (other than gastric) diagnosed in Northern Portugal between 2000 and 2006 (n=64,648) was followed until 31/12/2012 for gastric second primary cancers. Incidence rates, standardized incidence ratios and the cumulative incidence of gastric second primary cancers were calculated. RESULTS: Overall, 330 patients developed gastric second primary cancers (21.2% within two months). The incidence rate of gastric second primary cancers was higher within two months of the first primary cancer (standardized incidence ratios: 5.20 in males and 7.89 in females), particularly among survivors of cancers of the oesophagus, colon and rectum, than in the remaining period (standardized incidence ratios: 0.64 in males and 0.74 in females). The 10-year risk of a gastric second primary cancer was 0.6% (males: 0.7%; females: 0.4%). CONCLUSION: The incidence rate of gastric second primary cancers among cancer survivors was higher than in the general population only soon after the first primary cancer, and lower thereafter. Despite the high mortality, the probability of a gastric second primary cancer within 10-years of the first primary cancer was 0.6%

OBJETIVO: Comparar las tasas de incidencia de cáncer gástrico entre los sobrevivientes de cáncer con las de la población general y estimar la probabilidad de que se diagnostique un segundo cáncer primario gástrico 10 años después de cualquier otro primer cáncer primario. MÉTODO: Se siguió una cohorte de pacientes con un primer cáncer primario (excluyendo los gástricos) en el norte de Portugal entre 2000 y 2006 (n=64.648) hasta el 31/12/2012 para identificar un segundo cáncer primario gástrico. Se calcularon las tasas de incidencia, las razones de incidencia estandarizadas (RIE) y la incidencia acumulada de segundos cánceres primarios gástricos. RESULTADOS: En total, 330 pacientes desarrollaron un segundo cáncer primario gástrico (21,2% en 2 meses). La tasa de incidencia de los segundos cánceres primarios gástricos fue mayor dentro de los 2 meses posteriores al primero (RIE: 5,20 en hombres y 7,89 en mujeres), en particular entre los sobrevivientes de cáncer de esófago, colon y recto, que en el período restante (RIE: 0,64 en hombres y 0,74 en mujeres). El riesgo a 10 años de un segundo cáncer primario gástrico fue del 0,6% (hombres: 0,7%; mujeres: 0,4%). CONCLUSIONES: La tasa de incidencia de segundos cánceres primarios gástricos entre los sobrevivientes de cáncer fue más alta que en la población general solo poco después del primer cáncer, y más baja a partir de entonces. A pesar de la alta mortalidad, la probabilidad de un segundo cáncer primario gástrico a 10 años del primero fue del 0,6%

Rare thyroid malignancies in Europe: Data from the information network on rare cancers in Europe (RARECAREnet).

OBJECTIVE: Limited information is available on the incidence of rare thyroid cancer (TC) subtypes: anaplastic (ATC) and medullary (MTC). The aim of this study was to describe incidence variations and trends across European countries of all TC subtypes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the RARECAREnet database including 80721 TC incident cases in the period 2000-2007 from 77 population-based cancer registries (CRs) in Europe. In the trend analyses, we included 68890 TC cases from 53 CRs with at least 6 years of incidence data in the years 2000-2007. RESULTS: In Europe age-standardised incidence rates (ASR) in women were <0.3/100,000 for MTC and ATC whereas ASR were 5.3/100,000 for papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) and 1.1/100,000 for follicular TC (FTC). Corresponding ASRs in men were <0.2/100,000 for MTC and ATC, 1.5 for PTC and 0.4 for FTC. Across countries and in both sexes the incidence of FTC and MTC was moderately correlated (r ~ 0.5) with that of PTC, while a less marked correlation (r < 0.4) emerged for ATC ASRs. The changes of the PTC ASRs across countries and time were weakly (r < 0.3) or moderately (r ~ 0.5) correlated to the changes of the other subtypes for both sexes. CONCLUSION: The huge increase and heterogeneity between countries of PTC incidence has a small influence on the trends and variations of MTC and ATC in Europe. Large-scale epidemiological and clinical registry-based studies are warranted to increase knowledge about the rarest TC subtypes. This information would be fundamental for the design of new clinical trials and for inference.